• Print
return to E-Learning Initiative

CONTACT US


Center for Professional and Continuing Education
800.959.5376 or 209.946.2424
Office Location: 1776 W. March Lane Ste. 290, Stockton, CA 95207
Mailing Address: 3601 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95211
cpce@pacific.edu

Online Research Bibliography

  • Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (in press). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42 (2), 233-250.
  • Ally, M. (2005). Foundations of educational theory for online learning [Electronic version]. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (chapter 1). Canada: Athabasca University. Retrieved January 23, 2005, fromhttp://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/ch1.html
  • Anderson, T. (2001). The buzzword 'blended learning' has real meaning. The Central New York Business Journal, 15(46), 12.
  • Anderson, T. (2005). Toward a theory of online learning [Electronic version]. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (chapter 2). Canada: Athabasca University. Retrieved January 23, 2005, fromhttp://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/ch2.html
  • Ausburn, L. J. (Fall 2004). Gender and Learning Strategy Differences in Nontraditional Adult Students' Design Preferences in Hybrid Distance Courses; The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(2).
  • Ausburn, L.J. (2004). Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective. Educational Media International, 41(4), 327-337.
  • Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (March 20, 2002). Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 1-6. Retrieved November 15, 2004, fromhttp://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham2.htm
  • Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (Nov/Dec 1995). From teaching to learning-A new paradigm for undergraduate education [Electronic version.] Change, 27 (6).
  • Bauer, W. (July/August 2001). Enriching the traditional music classroom through Internet-based technologies. The Technology Source. Retrieved November 15, 2004 fromhttp://technologysource.org/article/ enriching_the_traditional_music_classroom_through_internetbased_technologies/
  • Beisser, S. R., & Steinbronn, P. E. (2002). Hybrid online coursework to enhance technology competencies of school principals. Computers in the Schools, 19 (3/4), 191-205. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (March 1999). Educational applications of CMCS: Solving case studies through asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (3). Retrieved February 16, 2005, fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue3/benbunan-fich.html
  • Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., Furuta, R., Hiltz, S.R., Noll, J., Preece, J., Stohr, E., Turoff, M., Van de Walle, B. (2002). Toward virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (4), 11-35.
  • Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  • Bonk, C. J., Olson, T. M., Wisher, R. A., & Orvis, K. L. (2002). Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning. Journal of Distance Education, 17 (3), 97-118.
  • Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (October 2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educatonal Media, 28(2-3), 165-178. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • Brooks, M. (2009). The excellent inevitability of online courses. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(38), A64. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Excellent-Inevitability/44251/
  • Brown, D. G. (August 2001). Hybrid courses are best. Syllabus: New Dimensions in Education Technology. Retrieved March 17, 2005, fromhttp://www.wfu.edu/%7Ebrown/Syllabus%20Articles/SylHybrid%20Courses.htm
  • Buckley, D. P. (January/February 2002) In pursuit of the learning paradigm [Electronic version].Educause Review, 37 (1), 29-38.
  • Bush, M., Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., & Wang, M.C. (2005). Student success in online learning. In R. Nata (Ed.), Issues in higher education (pp.1-14). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  • Cameron, B. (September/October 2003). The effectiveness of simulation in a hybrid and online networking course. TechTrends, 47 (5), 18-21. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from Wilson Web database.
  • Carroll, B. (2003). Going hybrid: Online course components increase flexibility of on-campus courses. Online Classroom, 4-7.
  • Center for Academic Transformation. (2005). Program in course redesign (PEW Grant). Retrieved April 11, 2005, from http://www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant.html
  • Cetron, M., & Cetron, K. (December 2003/January 2004). A forecast for schools. Educational Leadership, 61 (4), 22-29. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Christensen, T. K. (2003). Finding the balance: Constructivist pedagogy in a blended course.Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 235-243.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49 (2), 3-6.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (March 1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39 (7), 3-7.
  • Christensen, T.K. (2003). Finding the balance: Constructivist pedagogy in a blended course.Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 235-243.
  • Clark, R. E. (Winter 1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53 (4), 445-459. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from JSTOR database.
  • Clark, R. E. (October 1998). Motivating performance: Part 1 - Diagnosing and solving motivation problems. Performance Improvement, 37 (8), 39-47.
  • Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (2004). Building trust in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(2).
  • Cottrell, D.M. & Robinson, R.A. (2003). Blended learning in an accounting course. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 261-269.
  • Cox, G., Carr, T., & Hall, M. (2004). Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 183-193.
  • Dabbagh, N. (2002). Using a web-based course management tool to support face-to-face instruction. The Technology Source, March/April. Retrieved November 15, 2004, fromhttp://technologysource.org/article/ using_a_webbased_course_management_tool_to_support_facetoface_instruction/
  • Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., & Gyles, N. (December 2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes? Accounting Education, 12 (4), 373-391. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Duffy, T. M. & Kirkley, J. (2004). Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases for higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
  • Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Cavanagh, T. Moskal, P., (in press). Blended Courses as Drivers of Institutional Transformation. A. Kitchenham, Ed. Blended Learning Across Disciplines: Models for Implementation, Hershey: PA: IGI Global.
  • Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2005). Blended learning: Online learning enters the mainstream. In Bonk, C. J., & C. R. Graham, (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  • Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. (2007). Everything I Need to Know About Blended Learning I Learned From Books. In A. G. Picciano & C.D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives (pp. 265-286). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
  • Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L., & Moskal, P. D. (March 30, 2004). Blended learning. Educause Center for Applied Research Bulletin, 2004 (7). Retrieved November 15, 2004, fromhttp://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf.
  • Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P., Sorg, S., & Truman, B. (2004). Three ALN modalities: An institutional perspective. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Into the Mainstream (pp. 127-148). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
  • Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (February 11, 2005). A look at online teaching and learning at UCF. Presentation at Course Development & Web Services for IDL6543 participants, Orlando, FL
  • Dziuban, C.D., Moskal, P.D., Bradford, G.R., Brophy-Ellison, J., Groff, A.T. (2010). Constructs that impact the net generation's satisfaction with online learning. In Sharpe, R., Beetham, H. & De Freitas (eds). Rethinking learning for a digital age: how learners are shaping their own experiences. Routledge, New York.
  • Dziuban, C.D., Moskal, P.D., Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning, and the generations: Knowledge is power no more. In J. Bourne & J.C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities. Needham: MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
  • Dziuban, C.D., Moskal, P.D., Juge, F., Truman-Davis, B., Sorg, S. & Hartman, J. (2003). Developing a web-based instructional program in a metropolitan university. In B. Geibert & S. H. Harvey (Eds.), Web-wise learning: Wisdom from the field (pp. 47-81). Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Publications.
  • Dziuban, C., Shea, P., & Arbaugh, J. (2005). Faculty roles & satisfaction in asynchronous learning networks. In S.R. Hiltz, and R. Goldman (Eds.), Asynchronous learning networks: The research frontier. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Ehrlbaum Associates.
  • Educause. (2005). The pocket guide to U.S. higher education. Available athttp://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB2201.pdf
  • Farrell, E. F. (Feburary 13, 2004). Deeper pockets: Different tactics. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50 (23), A26-A29. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Finn, A. (November 2002). Trends in E-learning. Learning Circuits.
  • Frazee, R.V. (2003). Using relevance to facilitate online participation in a hybrid course.Educause Quarterly, No. 4, 67-69.
  • Futch, L.  (2005).   A study of blended learning at a metropolitan research university.  (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Publication/Order No. 3193475)
  • Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (March 20, 2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8 (6). Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm
  • Garrison, R., Kanuka, H., & Hawes, D. (2004). Blended learning in a research university.Learning Commons: Communities of Inquiry, University of Calgary.
  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
  • Garrison, D.R & Kanuta, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 7 (2), 95-105 .
  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008).  Blended Learning in Higher Education, Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Graff, M. (2003, October). Individual differences in sense of classroom community in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Media, 28 (2-3), 203-210.
  • Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham, (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  • Graham, C. R., & Allen, S. (in press). Blended learning: An emerging trend in education. In C. Howard, J. V. Boettecher, L. Justice, & K. D. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning: Online Learning and Technologies, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.
  • Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2003). Blended learning environments: A review of the research literature. Unpublished manuscript, Brigham Young University at Provo, UT.
  • Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (in press). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology I-V. Hershey, PA: Idea Groups Inc.
  • Graham, C.R., & Dziuban, C.D. (2008). Core research and issues related to blended learning environments. In J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J.J.G. Van Merrienboer, & M.P. Driscoll Eds.,Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). Upper New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Hartman, J. L. (2002). Models of practice in distributed learning: A catalyst for institutional transformation. Dissertation Abstracts Internationals, 63 (11), 3917. (UMI No. AAT 3069446).
  • Hartman, J.L., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2007). Strategic initiatives in the online environment: Opportunities and challenges. On The Horizon, 15 (3), 157-68.
  • Hartman, J. L., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (1999, August 16-18). Faculty satisfaction in ALNs: A dependent or independent variable? Paper presented at the Sloan Summer ALN Workshops: Learning Effectiveness and Faculty Satisfaction, Urbana, IL.
  • Hartman, J., Moskal, P., & Dziuban, C. (2005). Preparing the academy of today for the learner of tomorrow. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation, 6.1-6.15. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/
  • Hatfield, S. L. (July/August 2002). Understanding the four generations to enhance workplace management. AFP Exchange, 72-74. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Haytko, D. L. (Fall 2001). Traditional versus hybrid course delivery systems: A case study of undergraduate marketing planning courses. Marketing Education Review, 11 (3), 27-39. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Hiltz, S.R. & Goldman, R. (2005). Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hopper, K. (December 15, 2003). Hybrids: Reasons to go hybrid. Distance Education Report, 7(24), 7. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Humbert, J. & Vignare, K. (2005). RIT introduces blended learning-successfully!. In J. C. Moore (ed.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, Wisdom from the Sloan Consortium, Volume 2 in the Wisdom Series. Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
  • Jamaris-Stauts, C., Emerich, D., Harrer, N., Netzer, B., & Eustis, C. D. (2009.) Innovative Hybrid Online/On-Site Instruction: Leveraging Technology to Improve Learning Success. PowerPoint presentation from ELI Meeting. Accessed 5/20/11.http://www.educause.edu/Resources/InnovativeHybridOnlineOnSiteIn/163638
  • Johnson, J. (March 20, 2002). Reflections on teaching a large enrollment course using a hybrid format. [Electronic version]. Teaching with Technology Today, 8 (6). Retrieved May 13, 2011 from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/jjohnson.htm
  • Julian, E. H., & Boone, C. (n.d.). Blended learning solutions: Improving the way companies manage intellectual capital: An IDC whitepaper. IDC.
  • Krathwohl, David R. "A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview." Theory into practice 41.4 (2002): 212-218.
  • Kavenik, F. M., & Robinson, J. D. (April 9, 2003). UW-Parkside's Access Project. Teaching with Technology Today, 9 (7). Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/kavenik.htm
  • Kaleta, R., Skibba, K. A., & Joosten, T. (2009). Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses. In A. Picciano & C. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
  • Kerres, M., & DeWitt, C. (October 2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28 (2/3), 101-113. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Kim, K.J., & Bonk, C. (2006.) The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says... Educause Quarterly, 29 (4), 22-30. Retrieved fromhttp://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/ TheFutureofOnlineTeachingandLe/157426
  • King, K. P. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. [Electronic version]. Internet and Higher Education, 5 (2002), 231-246.
  • King, P., & Hildreth, D. (2001). Internet courses: Are they worth the effort? Journal of College Science Teaching, 31 (2), 112-115.
  • Laumakis, M. A. (2008). PSY 101 - Introductory Psychology (Syllabus).http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/advising/course%20syllabi_fa08/Psy101_Laumakis_fa08.pdf
  • Laumakis, M., Graham, C., Dziuban, C. (2009). The Sloan-C pillars and boundary objects as a framework for evaluating blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13 (1), 75-87.
  • Laws, R. D., Howell, S. L, & Lindsay, N. K. (Winter 2003). Scalability in distance education: "Can we have our cake and eat it too?" Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(4). Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter64/laws64.htm
  • Leh, A. S. C. (2002). Action research on hybrid courses and their online communities. [Electronic version]. Educational Media International, 39(1), 31-38.
  • Levine, S. L., & Wake, W. K. (October 20, 2000). Hybrid teaching: Design studios in virtual space. Paper presented at the 2000 National Conference on Liberal Arts and the Education of Artists, SVA, New York. Abstract retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://research.the-bac.edu/sva/index.htm
  • Lohr, L. L. & Ku, H. (2003). Development of a web-based template for active learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 4(3), 213-226.
  • LoShiavo, F. M. & Shatz. M. A. (2011). The impact of an honor code on cheating in online courses. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 7 (2).
  • Lowery, J. W. (July/August, 2001). The millennials come to campus: John Wesley Lowery talks with William Strauss. About Campus, 6-12. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from Wiley InterScience database.
  • Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (August 2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5. Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/189
  • MacDonald, J., & McAteer, E. (2003, October). New approaches to supporting students: strategies for blended learning in distance and campus based environments. Journal of Educational Media, 28 (2-3), 129-146.
  • Marsh, G. E., McFadden, A. C., & Price, B. J. (Winter 2003). Blended instruction: Adapting conventional instruction for large classes. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6 (4). Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter64/marsh64.html
  • Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 26 (1), 18-23.
  • Mayadas, F. (2001). Testimony to the Kerrey Commission on web-based education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (1), 134-138.
  • Matthews, H. (December 2002-January 2003). Hybrid courses and the future of teaching and learning at UC. UC TLtC News & Events.
  • McCray, G. E. (2000). The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom. Information Technology and Management, 1, 307-327.
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, U.S. Department of Education .
  • Meyer, K. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Networks, 7 (3), 55-65.
  • Moskal, P. (2009). Dancing with a bear: One university's experience with evaluating blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13 (1), 65-74.
  • Moskal, P.D., Dziuban, C., Hartman, J. (2010). Online Learning: A Transforming Environment for Adults in Higher Education. T. Kidd, Ed. Online Education and Adult Learning: New Frontiers for Teaching Practices, Hershey: PA: IGI Global.
  • Murphy, P. (December 2002-January 2003). The hybrid strategy: Blending face-to-face with virtual instruction to improve large lecture courses. UC TLtC News & Events.
  • Oblinger, D. (July/August, 2003). Boomers, gen-Xers, and millennials: Understanding the new students [Electronic version]. Educause Review, 38 (4), 37-47. Retrieved fromhttp://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0342.pdf
  • Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (Fall 2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (3), 227-234. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • O'Toole, J. M., & Absalom, D. J. (October 2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two? Journal of Educational Media, 28 (2-3), 179-190. Retrieved May 14, 2005, EBSCO Host database.
  • Pan, C., Sivo, S., & Brophy, J. (2003, December). Students' attitude in a web-enhanced hybrid course: A structural equation modeling inquiry. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 41 (2), 181-194.
  • Parkinson, D., Greene, W., Kim, Y., & Marioni, J. (2003). Emerging themes of student satisfaction in a traditional course and a blended distance course. TechTrends, 47 (4), 22-28.
  • Picciano, A. G., & Dziuban, C. D. (Eds.).  (2007).  Blended Learning Research Perspectives, United States:  The Sloan Consortium.
  • Priluck, R. (August 2004). Web-assisted courses for business education: An examination of two sections of principles of marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 26 (2), 161-173. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Reasons, Saxon G., Valadares, Kevin, & Slavkin, Michael. (2005). Questioning the hybrid model: Student outcomes in different course formats. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 9 (1), 83-94.
  • Reay, J. (Jul/Aug 2001). Blended learning-A fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review, 4 (3), 6. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Reeve, Kevin. (2007, September 18). Creating kick butt quality online courses. Seminar within Linked Campuses International Network. Retrieved June 20, 2011 fromhttp://lcin.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/resource-links-or-reeve-et-al-talk
  • Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness (RITE) ( http://rite.ucf.edu ). (December 2003). Focus group with instructional designers from Course Development & Web Services. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
  • Riffell, S.K., & Sibley, D.F. (2004). Can hybrid course formats increase attendance in undergraduate environmental science courses? Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 33, 1-5.
  • Riffell, S. K., and Sibley, D. H. (2003). Learning online: Student perceptions of a hybrid learning format. Journal of College Science Teaching, 32 (6), 394-399.
  • Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus
    Books
  • Robison, R. A. (2004). Selected faculty experiences in designing and teaching blended learning courses at Brigham Young University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65 (9), 3240. (UMI No. AAT 3147153)
  • Rooney, J. E. (May 2003). Knowledge infusion: Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Managment, 55 (5). Retrieved February 13, 2005, from InfoTrac database.
  • Rossett, A., Douglis, F., & Frazee, R. V. (June 2003). Strategies for building blended learning.Learning Circuits.
  • Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (August 2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5 (2). Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/192
  • Sands, P. (March 20, 2002). Inside outside, upside downside: Strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8 (6). Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/sands2.htm
  • Schwartzman, R., & Tuttle, H. V. (2002). What can online course components teach about improving instruction and learning? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29 (3), 179-188. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from Wilson Web database.
  • Schweizer, K., Paechter, M., & Weidenmann, B. (2003, October). Blended learning as a strategy to improve collaborative task performance. Journal of Educational Media, 28 (2-3), 211-224.
  • Shea, P., Pickett, A., & Pelz, W. (2003). A follow up investigation of "teacher presence" in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 61-80.
  • Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Centra Software. Retrieved November 15, 2004, fromhttp://www.centra.com/download/whitepapers/blendedlearning.pdf
  • Sloan-C. (April, 2004). The First Sloan-C Invitational Workshop on Blending Learning and Higher Education.
  • Spilka, R. (March 20, 2002). Approximately "real world" learning with the hybrid model. Teaching with Technology Today, 8 (6). Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/spilka.htm
  • Stein, D. (February 1, 2004). Course structure: Most important factor in student satisfaction. Distance Education Report, 8 (3), 4. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from EBSCO Host database.
  • Story, A. E., & DiElsi, J. (2003). Community building easier in blended format? Distance Education Report, 7 (11), 2, 7. Retrieved May 16, 2005, from WilsonWeb database.
  • Strambi, A., & Bouvet, E. (September 2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance: A mixed-mode environment for language learning. Language, Learning, & Technology, 7 (3), 81-102. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from InfoTrac database.
  • Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds), Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities. Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
  • Truman-Davis, B., Futch, L., Thompson, K., & Yonekura, F. (2000). Support for online teaching and learning [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 23 (2),44-51.
  • Tuckman, B.W. (2002). Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Computers and Education, 39, 261-269.
  • Twigg, C. A. (September/October 2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning [Electronic version]. Educause Review, 38 (5), 28-38.
  • University of Wisconsin/Milwaukee. (2011). Blended Courses. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from University of Wisconsin/Milwaukee, Learning Technology Center Web sitehttp://www4.uwm.edu/ltc/blended_courses/
  • Utts, J.; Sommer, B.; Acredolo, C.; Maher, M. W.; & Matthews, H. R. (2003). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education, 11 (3). Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n3/utts.html
  • Valiathan, P. (August 2002) . Blended learning models. Learning Circuits. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.astd.org/LC/2002/0802_valiathan.htm
  • Vaughan, N. & Garrison, D.R (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1-12.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Voos, R. (February 2003). Blended learning - What is it and where might it take us? Sloan-C View, 2 (1), 3-5.
  • Waddoups, G. L., & Howell, S. L. (January 2002). Bringing online learning to campus: The hybridization of teaching and learning at Brigham Young University. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved May 13, 2011, fromhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/52
  • Warnock, S. (2011.) Online Writing Teacher (blog) Accessed 5/20/11. http://onlinewritingteacher.blogspot.com/
  • Wendover, R. W. (2004). From Ricky & Lucy to Beavis & Butthead: Leading the new generations. The Center for Generational Studies, Inc.
  • Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies (1.3 ed.) Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.ewenger.com/tech
  • Wenger, E & Snyder, W (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review78 (1), p.139-145
  • Wernet, S. P., Olliges, R. H., & Delicath, T. A. (July 2000). Postcourse evaluations of WebCT (Web course tools) classes by social work students . Research on Social Work Practice, 10 (4), 487-504.
  • Willett, H. G. (2002). Not one or the other but both: Hybrid course delivery using WebCT. The Electronic Library, 20 (5), 413-419.
  • Williams, D., Howell, S., & Hricko, M. (2005). Online Assessment Measurement and Evaluation: Emerging Practices. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
  • Wingard, R. G. (2004). Classroom teaching changes in web-enhanced courses: A multi-institutional study [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 27 (1), 26-35. Retrieved May 2, 2004 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0414.pdf
  • Wu, D. & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 8 (2),
    139-151.